Where is Clavius in the Bible?

Clavius is not directly mentioned in the Bible. However, some believe he may be the same person as Cleophas, who is briefly mentioned in the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of John. In this comprehensive blog post, we will examine the evidence for and against Clavius being the biblical Cleophas. We will also explore who Clavius and Cleophas may have been, and why they are significant figures in the New Testament narrative.


In the biblical accounts of Jesus Christ’s life, death, and resurrection, there are references to some individuals who make brief appearances on the scene but about whom little is known. One such mysterious figure is Clavius, who some scholars identify with Cleophas, a disciple of Jesus mentioned in Luke 24 and John 19.

The question of whether Clavius and Cleophas are the same person has intrigued Bible scholars for centuries. The lack of detail about these two individuals in Scripture has led to debate, speculation, and differing theories about their possible identity and relationship to Jesus.

Viral Believer is reader-supported. We may earn a small fee from products we recommend at no charge to you. Read Our Affiliate Disclosuree

This blog post will dive deep into the question of where Clavius appears in the Bible. We will look at the scant biblical evidence, delve into the theories about who Clavius and Cleophas may have been, and examine the arguments for and against them being the same person.

For Christians seeking a deeper understanding of the Bible, exploring figures like Clavius and Cleophas can shed valuable light on the historicity and context of Scripture. Though they have small roles in the Gospel narratives, learning about their possible identities gives us a fuller picture of the diverse followers of Jesus and the early Christian movement.

Key Takeaways:

  • Clavius himself is never explicitly mentioned in the Bible. But some scholars identify him with Cleophas, who appears in Luke 24 and John 19.
  • Cleophas is one of the two disciples who met the resurrected Jesus on the road to Emmaus. Beyond this story, little is known about him.
  • The identifying of Clavius with Cleophas is plausible but uncertain. There are arguments on both sides.
  • Examining these kinds of biblical mysteries helps us understand the richness of the Scriptural accounts and the real people behind the stories.
Where is Clavius in the Bible?

Examining the Biblical Evidence

The name “Clavius” does not appear in the Bible. So where does he potentially fit in? Let’s look at the relevant biblical passages that refer to the figure who may be one and the same as the mysterious Clavius.

The potential connection arises from a man named Cleophas, who is mentioned in Luke 24 in the famous account of the Road to Emmaus appearance. After Jesus’ crucifixion, two of his followers were walking from Jerusalem to the village of Emmaus and encountered the resurrected Christ, but did not recognize him.

Here is the biblical account from Luke 24:13-27 (NKJV):

Now behold, two of them were traveling that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was seven miles from Jerusalem. And they talked together of all these things which had happened. So it was, while they conversed and reasoned, that Jesus Himself drew near and went with them. But their eyes were restrained, so that they did not know Him.

And He said to them, “What kind of conversation is this that you have with one another as you walk and are sad?”

Then the one whose name was Cleopas answered and said to Him, “Are You the only stranger in Jerusalem, and have You not known the things which happened there in these days?”

So He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a Prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered Him to be condemned to death, and crucified Him. But we were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel. Indeed, besides all this, today is the third day since these things happened. Yes, and certain women of our company, who arrived at the tomb early, astonished us. When they did not find His body, they came saying that they had also seen a vision of angels who said He was alive. And certain of those who were with us went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said; but Him they did not see.”

Then He said to them, “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! Ought not the Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into His glory?” And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.

In this passage, Cleophas is one of the two disciples walking to Emmaus. He and his companion do not recognize the risen Christ at first. The other disciple is unnamed in Luke.

Cleophas appears again in John 19:25 (NKJV):

Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.

Here the author refers to a “Mary the wife of Clopas” among the women at the Crucifixion. This “Clopas” is believed to be the same person as Cleophas in Luke 24. The difference in spelling can be attributed to variable translations from the original Aramaic name.

Beyond this, neither Cleophas nor Clavius appears in Scripture or is mentioned by name again. These two brief references are the only biblical evidence related to these figures. Everything else about their identity and relationship to Christ is speculative.

The Case for Clavius Being Cleophas

Given the lack of biblical information, how can the claim be made that the unknown Clavius is the same person as the minor biblical figure Cleophas?

The case rests on tradition, church history, and linguistic similarities that suggest Clavius and Cleophas are two renderings of the same Aramaic name.

Here are some key points that support identifying Clavius with Cleophas:

  • Church Tradition: Early church histories and traditions maintain that Clavius was the brother of Joseph, the husband of the Virgin Mary. If this is accurate, it would align with the description in John of a “Mary wife of Clopas” present at the crucifixion. Church traditions generally treat Clavius, Clopas, and Cleophas as the same person.
  • Linguistic Connection: The names Clavius, Clopas, and Cleophas are all thought to be variants of the Aramaic name Hilphi or Halphai. The differences can be attributed to being translated from Aramaic to Greek to Latin. This explains how a single figure could be referred to in different ways.
  • Context Points to Relative of Jesus: Cleophas in Luke 24 is described as one of Jesus’ followers returning from Jerusalem after the crucifixion. The fact that he seems to be a disciple of Jesus or associated with his family points to Clavius and Cleophas potentially being the same relative of Christ.

While compelling, these points are still speculative and circumstantial. The tradition of Clavius being a brother of Joseph emerged centuries after the biblical period, so its reliability is uncertain. And the linguistic link between the names, while possible, is not conclusive. Still, the contextual details make the identification of Cleophas and Clavius intriguing and plausible.

The Case Against Clavius Being Cleophas

Despite the above points, there are also arguments against equating Clavius and Cleophas. Here are some reasons why the two may not be the same person after all:

  • Silence of Scripture: Nowhere does the Bible explicitly identify Cleophas as a relative of Jesus or connect him to Clavius. If Clavius were truly prominent as a brother of Joseph, it seems strange he would not be mentioned.
  • Dubious Church Traditions: The later church traditions about Clavius could simply represent mistaken attempts to flesh out an unknown biblical character. The absence of earlier attestation makes it uncertain.
  • Problem of Apostolic Authority: If Cleophas was Jesus’ uncle, it seems unusual that he would not have been ascribed greater authority in the early church, since he would have been a blood relative of Christ.
  • Different Names Not Variants: The names Clavius and Cleophas may in fact be entirely different Aramaic names that only sound similar, rather than different renderings of the same name.
  • Purpose of Luke Narrative: The story in Luke seems focused on the unbelief of the disciples, so identifying Cleophas as a relative of Jesus would contradict this literary purpose.

Given these counterarguments, we cannot state definitively that Clavius and Cleophas were the same biblical person. Absent clearer evidence, their connection remains speculative. The arguments against reduce confidence that the two names refer to the same individual.

Who Was Clavius?

If we move beyond the issue of whether Clavius was Cleophas, we can explore who this mysterious Clavius may have been based on traditions about him.

Here are some key possibilities about the identity of Clavius:

  • Brother of Joseph: Early apocryphal gospels and church histories identify Clavius as a brother of Joseph, the husband of Mary. This would make him an uncle or relative of Jesus.
  • Disciple of Jesus: Some traditions also describe Clavius as one of the 70 or 72 disciples sent out by Jesus to preach during his ministry, which would make him a follower of Christ.
  • Witness of Resurrection: As potentially the same person as Cleophas, Clavius could have been one of the early eyewitnesses of the risen Christ on the road to Emmaus. This would give him special authority.
  • Leader in Jerusalem Church: Other accounts suggest Clavius became a leader in the nascent Christian community in Jerusalem after Pentecost. If true, he played a key role in the early church.
  • Associate of Apostles: Traditions identify him as working closely with important apostles like Peter, James, and John, which would place him near the center of early church leadership.
  • Christian Martyr: There are some legends that Clavius was later martyred for his faith in Christ, making him one of the first Christian martyrs. However, these traditions are late and unverified.

While fascinating, these traditions are too uncertain to base firm conclusions about Clavius on. They provide hypothetical glimpses of what his life and ministry could have been like as a relative and follower of Jesus in the first generation of Christianity.

Who Was Cleophas?

Since Cleophas is briefly mentioned in Scripture, we have slightly more evidence about him. Here is what we can deduce about the identity of Cleophas:

  • Disciple of Jesus: The fact that he was returning from Jerusalem after the crucifixion indicates Cleophas was likely a disciple of Jesus or at least an associate.
  • Witness of Resurrection: As one of the two disciples on the Emmaus Road, Cleophas became one of the first witnesses of the resurrected Christ.
  • Possible Relative of Jesus: His companionship with a “Mary wife of Clopas” suggests he may have been an uncle or relative of Jesus through marriage to Mary’s sister.
  • Resided in Emmaus: The town of Emmaus appears to have been Cleophas’ home, to which he was traveling after the Passover events.
  • Name Means “Son of Alphaeus”: The name Cleophas or Clopas means “son of Alphaeus” in Aramaic, which may provide a clue to his family ancestry.
  • Also Called Alpheus: Some scholars argue Cleophas and Alphaeus are alternative names for the same person. If so, he could be identified with “Alpheus” mentioned in other biblical passages.

While more can be conjectured, these conclusions are reasonably grounded in the brief biblical references to Cleophas. The sparse scriptural data prevents dogmatism about his identity beyond these basic observations.

The Significance of Clavius and Cleophas

Why does the identity of obscure figures like Clavius and Cleophas matter? What is their significance? Here are some reasons these elusive biblical characters are important:

  • Shed light on “relatives of Jesus”: They help explain possible extended family members of Christ and relatives involved in early Christian community.
  • Illustrate diversity among followers: Their undefined identity shows that Jesus’ followers came from a range of backgrounds, not just the famous apostles.
  • Provide extra-biblical attestation: Traditions about Clavius give potential historical corroboration for family relationships not contained in the Bible.
  • Link to resurrection witnesses: As one of the Emmaus travelers, Cleophas was an early resurrection witness whose authority lent credence to Christ’s rising.
  • Demonstrate historiographical complexity: The difficulty identifying them sheds light on the complexities of tracing history through ancient texts and traditions.
  • Spark valuable debate: Academic debates about the relationship between Clavius and Cleophas force closer examination of Scripture and enrich understanding.

For scholars, these kinds of biblical puzzles provide opportunities to gain new perspectives. Even minor characters cast faint light on the broader context that allows us to perceive the biblical stories and messages more clearly.


In summary, the alleged biblical figure Clavius remains a puzzling enigma. His supposed connection to Cleophas is intriguing but uncertain. While church traditions fill out his biography, the lack of scriptural corroboration makes it difficult to equate him definitively with the Cleophas mentioned briefly by Luke and John. However, examining the question can enrich biblical study and prompt careful re-reading of the gospel texts for clues. Whether Clavius turns out to be Cleophas or someone else entirely, this exercise illuminates the need for humility and grace as we mine the histories and traditions surrounding Scripture. The true value is a better understanding of the Bible’s meanings, not definitive conclusions about obscure identities. After millennia, some riddles remain unsolved. Yet exploring them drives us deeper into the texts, which contain inexhaustible significance and revelation.

About The Author

Scroll to Top